|
||
February 1st 2005 |
Your Daily Fantasy Rx |
|||||||||
|
by Tim Polko National League Outfielders with Single-digit Positive Draft Value
Quick Key to the tables: Players are ranked in order from the highest draft value in a 4x4 league to the lowest. As the majority of fantasy leagues allow you to keep anyone traded to the other league, all players are listed in the league where they began the season.
The Jose Guillen acquisition continues to boggle my mind given Washington's stated commitment to Brad Wilkerson, Nick Johnson, and Endy Chavez, not to mention the respective upsides of Juan Rivera, Ryan Church, and Sledge. While he struggled against southpaws and requiring a platoon partner, Sledge deserves to start after posting a .277/.352/.489 performance against right-handed pitchers, supported by a 4.04 #P/PA, .10 walk rate, .83 contact rate, and a 1.09 G-F. Second-half improvement also suggests he should remain productive even in a reduced role, so definitely target Sledge for a few bucks in NL drafts in the hope of obtaining a bargain who could emerge as excellent trade bait in keeper leagues.
My major concern regarding the Dodgers' likely left fielder is his partially torn right elbow ligament that may force him out indefinitely at some point. Of course, Werth also only managed a .246/.320/.446 performance as a regular in the second half last year, so despite the upside suggested by his 4.33 #P/PA and .76 G-F, I can't recommend investing any significant sum in the youngster. He only turns 26 in May, so the best plan here should involve letting another owner overbid into double digits, watch Werth miss at least half the season due to injury, and then grab him cheap in 2006 when he should emerge as a quality $15 player if Los Angeles doesn't acquire a superior option during the intervening year.
Intriguing skill trends depicting developing patience and power potential portend a return to double-digit value, especially if Tucker enters a center field platoon with Marquis Grissom as we expect. Tucker posted an acceptable .260/.360/.420 performance against right-handers, although examining anything other than his monthly splits fails to illuminate his performance. He failed to reach a .230 BA in April, August, and September while compiling only 5 homers and 28 RBI in those months. Yet his average never sunk under a.265 from May through July as he registered 8 homers and 33 RBI, as well as four of his give steals and a significant majority of his runs scored. I still recommend targeting him in the latter rounds of NL drafts due to his strong skills, but regardless of his first-half numbers, you still need to shop Tucker heavily around the All-Star break.
Moving to Texas thankfully provides Hidalgo with a replacement environment for Houston, intriguing slotting him behind baseball's best offensive infield of Mike Young, Hank Blalock, Mark Teixeira, and Alfonso Soriano. Yes, Hidalgo posted a poor average as his walk and contact rates slipped precipitously, but his patience and ground-fly ratio remained intact, so I see no reason he won't rebound towards at least $20 in value playing for the Rangers. Although exceeding that price presents an unnecessary gamble, a 30/100 season seems conservative given the multiple factors suggesting an impressive fantasy season for Hidalog.
Long looks perfectly positioned to spend this season in a surprisingly productive platoon with lefty-masher Eli Marrero. While career-worst skills of a 3.62 #P/PA and 1.45 G-F certainly trouble me, leaving Petco for Kauffman should result in a useful power surge. Considering Long also managed an excellent .347/.380/.492 performance after the break, he stands a good chance of returning to double-digit value. He looks like a good buy anywhere much under $10 assuming he enters the season as no worst than a platoon starter for the Royals.
Please refer to our Post-2004 Prospect Review: Colorado for my comments on Piedra.
Click
here to read the previous article.
Please e-mail your comments to
tim@rotohelp.com. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rotohelp |
||||||||||||
All content ©2001-18 Rotohelp, Inc. All rights reserved. PO Box 72054 Roselle, IL 60172. Please send your comments, suggestions, and complaints to: admin@rotohelp.com. |
||||||||||||