|
||
March 9th 2004 |
Your Daily Fantasy Rx |
|||||||||
|
by Tim Polko Every year a couple dozen players receive at least a brief look in the majors almost solely due to their place on a major league 40-man roster. Unfortunately, other than top prospects and Rule 5 picks, we generally spend little time examining any players who spent all of the previous season playing below AA. Reviewing the impressive number of youngsters who rather unexpectedly reach majors each year convinced us that these players deserve more attention, so I will elaborate on the fantasy prospects of many of these players over the next few days. While I recognize I can't provide a complete list of players likely to contribute due to the frequent changes on many 40-man rosters, not to mention the extreme uncertainty regarding in-season roster management on each team, hopefully these snapshots will provide you with another look at many largely unknown players.
While the Cubs smartly dumped Nate Frese off the 40-man roster, adding another solid defensive shortstop who absolutely can't hit makes no sense. The odds of Cedeno developing into a decent contributor even in a reserve role seem small, and considering he offers virtually no offensive upside, do not draft him.
The Cubs' impressive cache of left-handed pitching prospects likely will push Pinto to the bullpen or another organization, but he owns both the dominance and control necessary to develop into an effective starter in the majors. While he likely needs at least another two years of development time, like so many of his teammates, Pinto should begin contributing within the relatively near future. Despite Pinto's solid upside, you also obviously can't draft him now since we have no idea when or where he'll debut in the majors.
Perhaps the most surprising addition to the Cubs' 40-man roster, Vasquez nevertheless owns fairly promising skills and could advance quickly. However, unless his strikeout rate heads upward, I expect he'll head to the bullpen within the next two years, making him a poor choice in any fantasy league.
Bergolla's weak plate discipline, negligible power, and the Reds' respectable infield depth kept me from recommending him in the fall, but despite his impressive speed, he doesn't belong on fantasy teams quite yet. Bergolla likely needs two more years in the minors, and Cincinnati also doesn't need to rush him. Wait until he at least echoes these numbers at AA Chattanooga before rostering him.
Dealt from Boston to Cincinnati with Tyler Pelland for Scott Williamson, Dumatrait offers intriguing upside thanks to his left-handed dominance. Unfortunately, his weak control over parts of three seasons of A-ball makes him a questionable prospect, and he merits no fantasy consideration until he at least posts similar stats in the upper minors for a year or two.
Gimenez appears somewhat overrated as a prospect right now considering his mediocre batting performance, but any switch-hitting catcher with great defensive gifts deserves some attention. Of course, with John Buck ahead of him in almost every respect, Gimenez shouldn't reach the majors sooner than the end of 2005, making him a poor roto selection right now.
While Houston's talent for developing solid reserve outfielders is impressive, waiving Henri Stanley and Colin Porter to make room on the 40-man roster for Jimerson was a highly questionable move. Only Jimerson's speed suggests much upside as his age and troubling strikeout totals depict a player more likely to spend his career in the minors than develop in to a star. Avoid him in every draft.
I didn't review Astacio in the fall since I didn't believe his inclusion in the Billy Wagner trade eased his path to the majors. He still faces significant competition for advancement within the Houston system, and control artists who first reach AA at age 24 often have struggled in the past. As he lacks obvious dominance and a clear path to the majors, Astacio belongs on no fantasy rosters at this time.
I definitely don't recommend drafting Ezequiel Astacio this spring, but Astacio looks like a future Cy Young winner compared to Barrett, who's managed only one promising performance in three seasons of A-ball. He possesses little control or dominance, and the Astros missed a great opportunity to remove him from the 40-man roster in the first half of 2003. Barrett probably will return to A-ball yet again, making him a terrible fantasy pick in any league.
Of course, the Astros do possess some projectable starters, such as Nieve, who looks like a potential ace. Unfortunately, his somewhat slow climb through the system suggests he'll plateau as an innings eater rather than a star, but he at least should give Houston good trade bait. Since we have no idea if he'll reach the majors in an Astros' uniform, don't draft Nieve at this time.
Pitchers: With only parts of two professional seasons under his belt, projecting Bausher as anything more than bullpen fodder is a mistake. Yet he obviously dominated with Midwest League last year, and a 1.98 ERA on a 14:3 K:BB in 13.2 IP in the Arizona Fall League secured a 40-man roster spot for him. Bausher isn't draftable now, but he could emerge as one of the Brewers' best bullpen prospects by the end of 2004.
Milwaukee moved Saenz into the rotation this year while promoting him from the Midwest League, and if we attribute his homer rate to playing in one of the minors' worst pitchers' parks, his skills look rather respectable. While his fantastic strikeout rate indicates a pitcher with potential to remain effective in the upper minors, an elevated walk rate also suggests an eventual shift back to relief work. Since we don't know his future role, selecting him is a bad idea, but Saenz looks like a solid sleeper for the Brewers.
Aside from a weak walk rate, Sarfate's improvement this season places him among the top starting prospects in a largely unimpressive cadre of young Milwaukee pitchers. He could move quickly through the system, yet until he at least echoes these stats in the upper minors, Sarfate won't merit roto consideration.
Pitchers: Although Bradley, the 8th player chosen in the 1999 draft, now ranks as an obvious sleeper, two elbow operations and shoulder surgery over the last few seasons leave him with little immediate upside. He likely will spend 2004 rediscovering his promise from 2000 prior to his injuries, so selecting him in a fantasy league now ranks as an extremely questionable gamble.
While Cox hasn't fulfilled the promise he displayed in the upper minors during the mid-90s, and his 2003 constitute an almost complete disaster, he still could develop into a decent hitter. Knee problems cost him most of last season, but since he should be completely recovered now, he could contribute to the Cardinals, possibly as a starting first baseman or even an outfielder. Unfortunately, I can't recommend taking a chance on him quiet yet given his steadily declining production, however I like Cox's fantasy potential a lot more than someone like Ray Lankford, who didn't play last year and isn't in his peak years. Although Cox is too risky to select in most drafts, he could emerge as a solid free agent pickup early in the season.
Click
here to read the previous article.
Please e-mail your comments to
tim@rotohelp.com. |
||||||||
Rotohelp |
||||||||||||
All content ©2001-18 Rotohelp, Inc. All rights reserved. PO Box 72054 Roselle, IL 60172. Please send your comments, suggestions, and complaints to: admin@rotohelp.com. |
||||||||||||