|
||
December 13th 2003 |
Your Daily Fantasy Rx |
|||||||||
|
by Tim Polko National League Third Basemen without Positive Draft Value
Quick Key to the tables: Average league worst BA, ERA, and WHIP based on data compiled from TQ Stats. Players are ranked in order from the highest draft value in a 4x4 league to the lowest. As the majority of fantasy leagues allow you to keep anyone traded to the other league, all players are listed in the league where they began the season.
Instead of establishing himself as a super-utilityman or even winning an outfield spot or even the third base job outright, Macias badly bombed in his first full season in the National League. If not for an excellent performance in Puerto Rico, Macias might have lost his roster spot by mid-season, however a .205/.219/.286 in the second half should spell his end in an Expos' uniform. Not only did his meager plate discipline disappear, Macias also failed to steal even a single base after July. At least he still owns decent speed skills, but until you see him receive the opportunity necessary to begin compiling helpful SB numbers again, Macias will not belong on your fantasy teams.
While his release from Philadelphia at the end of August surprised me, his failure to find a job in September seems truly shocking. Yes, he struggled after the break, but Houston also managed a superb a .448/.484/.586 performance in 29 pinch-hit at-bats. Any downturn in production seems more attributable to rust than skill degradation, although a career-worst 2.21 G-F limits his power upside. Don't view him as anything more than roster filler unless he returns to a more significant role.
Williams' retirement following his June release made sense considering his refusal to depart Arizona for Larry Walker last fall. While he still owns decent skills, he appears quite unlikely to return to the game, especially since he only lost his job due to the Diamondbacks' rather senseless trade of Byung-Hyun Kim for Shea Hillenbrand. The 1994 strike cost Williams more than anyone as though Tony Gwynn missed a .400 season, he still will head to the Hall of Fame. Williams remained on pace to break Roger Maris' record when the season ended. Mark McGwire instead usurped Maris, leaving Williams well short of any career honor despite five All-Star appearances, four Gold Gloves, four Top-6 MVP finishes, and a World Series' ring with Arizona.
The perpetually undervalued Branyan again allowed an abysmal .61 contact rate to destroy the promise suggested by his 4.05 #P/PA and .62 G-F. Even a .240 BA might allow him to post the .800 OPS apparently necessary to earn regular employment. As Cincinnati simply can't afford another strikeout machine in their lineup, don't be surprised if he heads elsewhere before next season. Branyan similarly won't merit much fantasy consideration until he either improves his average or secures the stable role necessary for owners to ignore the average drain due to his quantitative upside.
Utilitymen usually need to register an OPS above .558 to remain in the majors even if they can handle catching. Although Guzmans's .352/.372/.460 performance in 213 AB at AAA Edmonton(PCL) warranted another big league opportunity and he could snag a bench job with a good camp next spring, his nearly complete lack of patience and power potential renders him useless for fantasy purposes. Only a respectable contact rate gives him any long-term upside whatsoever.
Please refer to our Post-2003 Prospect Review: Cincinnati for my comments on Hummel.
Please refer to our Post-2003 Prospect Review: Philadelphia for my comments on Chapman.
Please refer to our Post-2003 Prospect Review: Cincinnati for my comments on Chamblee.
With his long-term albatross contract finally over, Tatis will need an unexpectedly excellent spring training performance or a good season in the minors to earn another big league opportunity. While he remains relatively patient, inconsistent defense and decreasing power potential leave his career at a crossroads. I see no reason to roster Tatis in any league until he demonstrates some ability to rebound from his rather disastrous three-year stint with the Expos.
Please refer to our Post-2003 Prospect Review: Colorado for my comments on Atkins.
Registering four singles, one RBI, 3 Runs, and a 3:1 BB:K in 14 AB somehow convinced the Marlins to re-sign Harris despite his terrible performance over the balance of the season. He managed all of a .489 OPS as a pinch-hitter this year, and while improving patience might give him a shot at an acceptable OBP, I see no evidence to suggest Harris offers anything to fantasy teams.
Larson entered the year as a top Rookie of the Year candidate and instead posted one of the worst performances in the majors. While a couple of minor injuries limited his effectiveness, he only managed 4 hits in his first 48 at-bats before Cincinnati optioned him. An excellent rebound at AAA Louisville(IL), including a .323/.384/.617 performance in 282 AB, earned him another shot with the Reds, but he couldn't even post a .460 OPS in 41 at-bats before a labrum tear ended his season in mid-August. Expect Larson to receive a long look in spring training, yet although I like his long-term upside a lot, I suspect he needs a change of scenery to fulfill his potential after seven relatively unimpressive seasons with Cincinnati.
Although Bell looked like a bad signing a year ago, no one expected him to rank with the worst players in the game. Chase Utley probably deserves a starting job far more than Bell, yet the veteran at least remained a solid defender. Bell should recover from the back problems that cost him nearly the entire second half by spring training, and considering he essentially maintained all his skills, expect a strong rebound if he's healthy since his contract essentially guarantees him regular playing time.
Click
here to read the previous article.
Please e-mail your comments to
tim@rotohelp.com. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rotohelp |
||||||||||||
All content ©2001-18
Rotohelp, Inc.
All rights reserved. PO Box 72054 Roselle, IL 60172. Please send your comments, suggestions, and complaints to: admin@rotohelp.com. |
||||||||||||