|
||
November 16th 2003 |
Your Daily Fantasy Rx |
|||||||||
|
by Tim Polko Click here for discussion of our initial rosters for Fantasy and Budget Baseball. As veteran readers will remember, we ran the same roster in both leagues all year as each game employs essentially identical rules. Go here for discussion of our initial roster for Mid-Season Fantasy Baseball.
Fantasy Baseball & Budget Baseball(same players on both teams)
Mid-Season Fantasy Baseball
Super Challenge
Lopez was the logical pick here, easily outdistancing Varitek and Lieberthal in cost-effectiveness. Any combination of these three catchers or even a variation including Ramon Hernandez(1390) or A.J. Pierzynski(1260) would have provided excellent numbers for a reasonable price. Of course, any team without Lopez likely struggled given his overall value. Next year's picks here again appear totally dependent upon assigned salaries, although Victor Martinez looks like an early favorite to join a couple of the aforementioned catchers on our roster.
Never adding Huff on our full-season team qualifies as an obvious failure here. He provided points nearly twice as cost-efficient as Helton. Thomas, Durazo, Dmitri Young(1520), and David Ortiz(1630) also were much more useful than the expensive first basemen. The sheer depth of marginally acceptable first basemen usually available makes predicting likely 2004 buys very difficult, but someone like Phelps should be very tempting if his salary remains low.
Soriano and Boone were relatively good buys, but Giles ranks with the best players in the 2003 games. While Michael Young wasn't much less valuable, his relatively weak skills still worry us. Ellis wasn't great, although both he and Hudson were much more cost-effective than even Kent or Vidro. As long as Giles' salary stays under 2000, he likely will return to our squad next year, and if Jimenez looks secure leading off for the Reds, his production should warrant more consideration.
Forgoing Blalock in full-season ball was as poor a decision as skipping Huff. Blalock and Bill Mueller(1510) contributed better numbers than Ramirez or Lowell, however Crede's second-half surge left him with decent overall stats. Although Rolen led the position in total points, a combination of Blalock, Mueller, and Teixeira easily ranked as the most efficient here, and we'll look for similar players next season. Teixeira should be a good play at first base, and Blalock should remain relatively cheap, while both Ensberg and Sean Burroughs(1100) could emerge as a useful acquisitions.
While ARod(3580) easily lapped the position in total, we wisely avoided his salary. Employing Nomar, Cabrera, and Furcal worked great here as their combination of points and cost-efficiency at least gave us one position with solid values. Jose Reyes(1500) looked like a future stud in the second half, and I expect he'll join Cabrera and either Jimmy Rollins(1740) or one of this year's shortstops on our 2004 teams.
Outfielders with salaries of 1990 or less: Our picks: Ken Griffey Jr.(1900: FBB, MS), Vernon Wells(1780: FBB, MS), Hideki Matsui(1500: FBB, MS), Austin Kearns(1600: FBB), Milton Bradley(1170: MS), and Juan Gonzalez(1980: FBB-P). Pujols, Sheffield, Wells, and Manny were the top 4 outfielders, and Wilson finished 6th, just behind Bonds. Of course, Wells' salary made him an exceptional buy, Sheffield, Ramirez, and Wilson all were fairly efficient. Both Rocco Baldelli(1000) and Carl Crawford(1070) should have been on our teams, so we'll try not to ignore speedsters next year as long as they appear in the lineup every day. Matsui played well, and Hidalgo helped in September, however relying on Berkman, Walker, and Vlad didn't work at all. In 2004, I suspect we'll return to Griffey, Kearns, and Adam Dunn(2000) as their salaries should remain quite stable. Other likely targets include Wilson, Wells, Bradley, Corey Patterson(1410), Jason Bay(1500), and Miguel Cabrera(1500).
Starting Pitchers with salaries of 1990 or less: Our picks: Jason Schmidt(1990: FBB, MS), Mark Prior(1800: FBB, MS), Kevin Brown(1910: FBB, MS-P), Kurt Ainsworth(1000: FBB), Esteban Loaiza(1900: MS), Rich Harden(1500: FBB-P), Brandon Webb(1500: MS-P), and Jose Contreras(1500: MS-P). Given our investment in starting pitching, we chose wisely in rostering Halladay, Prior, Wood, and Schmidt from the beginning, although skipping Wood in mid-season obviously was a mistake. Never adding Loaiza in full-season hurt, as did ignoring Andy Pettitte most of the season. The only pitchers that ranked in the top 30 in points who failed to pitch 200 innings were Pedro and Miller, so we may avoid more fragile pitchers in 2004. Unfortunately, worrying too much about Brown's injury cost us early stats, so if the salaries of Randy and Schilling fall, they easily could return to our team. Next year, we're going to pay much more attention to IP/GS and K/9 in selecting pitchers here, along with the obvious consideration of run support. Therefore, Brett Myers, Jake Peavy, Brandon Webb, and any new starters on Boston or the Yankees will look like good picks, in addition to Halladay, Prior, Wood, and Schmidt.
Gagne outdistanced even Foulke by nearly 100 points, although both players are nearly automatic selections next year, assuming Foulke lands with Oakland or Boston. However, Worrell, Rocky Biddle(1500), Joe Borowski(1500), Mantei, Lance Carter(1000), and MacDougal all contributed relatively solid stats. Unless Gagne, Foulke, Wagner(2430), and Smoltz(2910) all wind up with salaries below 2500, we see little reason not to run a couple of cheaper closers, particularly given the salary raises due elite starters we need like Halladay and Prior.
Click
here to read the previous article.
Please e-mail your comments to
tim@rotohelp.com. |
||||||||
Rotohelp |
||||||||||||
All content ©2001-18
Rotohelp, Inc.
All rights reserved. PO Box 72054 Roselle, IL 60172. Please send your comments, suggestions, and complaints to: admin@rotohelp.com. |
||||||||||||