|
||
February 4th 2003 |
Your Daily Fantasy Rx |
|||||||||
|
by Tim Polko American League Relief Pitchers with DV from $10 to $15
Quick Key to the tables: Average league worst BA, ERA, and WHIP provided for 2002 leagues courtesy of Rototimes, based on data compiled from TQ Stats. Players are ranked in order from the highest draft value in a 4x4 league to the lowest. As the majority of fantasy leagues allow you to keep anyone traded to the other league, all players are listed in the league where they began the season. Pitchers who started half or more of their major league games in 2002 are listed with starters.
We were relatively pleased Hernandez's performance once healthy in 2002 and believed he'd remain a closer for another season or two despite him rapidly approaching his forties. However signing with Atlanta should end his career at the back end of a pen since we don't expect further arm problems from Smoltz. I doubt Hernandez will reach this level of value again, but he could approach $10 given his mostly decent skill set and Atlanta's recent magic in converting decent relievers into dominating firemen. Hernandez's 1.78 G-F and 2.1 BB/9 both were much better than his career norms, and I see little wrong with his 6.8 K/9 and 1.0 HR/9. The biggest problem here is a 10.8 hit rate, and now he's moved from the 25th best defensive team in the game to the third best. I'll be happy to draft Hernandez for a couple bucks since he should earn a nice profit, and if Smoltz does hit the DL, Hernandez is the logical recipient of any save opportunities after the departures of Remlinger, Hammond, Ligtenberg, and Spooneybarger.
Jerry Manuel failed Keith Foulke and the White Sox by moving Foulke from his customary closer role as only four AL relievers contributed more qualitative support to fantasy teams in 2002 than Foulke, suggesting that he remained extremely effective despite his early season slump. He finished in the middle of the top 30 MLB relievers while Billy Koch failed to qualify for that list, yet Kenny Williams still allowed Billy Beane to swipe Foulke with a solid backup catcher and relief prospect while "upgrading" to Billy Koch. The only real concern with Foulke's performance is that his strikeout rate dropped for the third straight season, falling to 6.7 K/9 only a couple years after he posted a 10.5. His 1.04 G-F was his best mark since his 1997 debut, and a 1.5 BB/9 was easily his career-best control ratio. I won't be slightly surprised if Foulke maintains his Eck-like pace of the second half and builds upon his .74 ERA, which was supported by a 27:3 K:BB in 36.2 IP with 25 H and 2 HR, especially since his new team owns a better offense, defense, and pitching staff than Chicago while they play in a better park. Foulke likely will rank as the top pitcher in the AL in 4x4 leagues in 2003, and he'll finish among the top few hurlers in 5x5 leagues..
The vast majority of Yan's value derived from his quantitative contribution, and while he should win over a half-dozen games as a Rangers' middle relievers thanks to a likely rebound from their offense, he'll lose around $10 in saves alone. His G-F dropped from a career-best 1.42 to a 1.06, a bit below his career norm, even a his strikeout rate fell from 9.2 to 6.9 K/9 and his walk rate jumped from 1.6 to 3.8 BB/9. Yan's biggest problem was that he allowed a .914 OPS from lefties even while holding right-handers to a .627 OPS. However he also somehow rebounded in the second half, posting a 3.60 ERA on a 35:14 K:BB in 35 IP with 30 H and 5 HR after a disastrous 5.03 ERA on an 18:15 K:BB in 34 IP before the break. Unfortunately his general inconsistency keep me from expecting him to maintain his second-half pace, making anything above a few bucks for Yan seem unnecessarily risky.
I'm particularly proud that we nailed this projection as we saw several middle relievers reach double-digit value this year, however Rhodes was the only AL reliever above $10 who didn't start at all or save more than a couple games. Most of Rhodes' 2002 skills remained nearly identical to his 2002 marks, and the sole exception was his G-F ratio, which improved from a 1.22 G-F to a career-best 1.40. While he held lefties to an obscene .418 OPS on a 41:3 K:BB, Rhodes also limited right-handers to a .579 OPS on a still-solid 40:10 K:BB. Thanks to Sasaki's arm troubles and subsequent surgery Rhodes might even spend some time closing in 2003, making me more likely to expect he'll reach $20 than fall below $10. Rhodes a good buy anywhere in single digits.
The departures of Stanton and Mendoza make Steve Karsay the key component of New York's pen in 2003 as the only returning veteran set-up man. Unfortunately he's recovering from off-season back surgery and will barely be ready to start the regular season on time, so he's unlikely to regain his dominating form from past years. I also don't envision him saving more than a half-dozen games, leaving his projected value right around $10. Karsay still owns one of the better skill sets of any middle reliever in baseball, yet problems in both his strikeout and walk rates, coupled with his current injury, make any bids approaching double-digits look rather risky right now.
Weber is far less likely to repeat his 2002 stats than any other Anaheim reliever, although he clearly will remain in a vital middle relief role between the starters and late-inning trio of Donnelly, KRod, and Percival. I don't envision him saving any games this season given how Mike Scioscia used him in the post-season, but only a weak 5.0 K/9 keeps me from strongly recommending Weber. His 3.66 G-F is fantastic and among the best ratios in the game, and a 2.5 BB/9 demonstrates solid control. I wouldn't bid more than a few dollars for Weber since I don't see significant upside here, however hopefully the massive post-season exposure of Anaheim's late-inning relief corps will allow you grab Weber for a buck or two.
Wickman is signed through 2004, so while he'll likely miss all of 2003, he offers an intriguing option to owners in keeper leagues. Aside from the damage inflicted by the worst defense in the majors and slight concern thanks to his career-worst 1.86 G-F, I see nothing else even marginally wrong with Wickman's skills. He should earn $20+ next season, making him an excellent late-draft steal for a few bucks as long as you can stash him on reserve for a year.
Like Wickman, the upside of drafting Cordero lies in his long-term upside for keeper leagues. Ugueth Urbina will close in 2003 for Texas, and Jeff Zimmerman likely will see most save opportunities once he returns from injury. However some time in either 2004 or 2005, Cordero should emerge as an excellent closer for Texas. He finally appears healthy, and after posting nearly perfect across-the-board skills last year, he should earn around $10 for a season or two before at least doubling his value once closing. Jump at Cordero anywhere in the low-to-mid single digits, and anyone in keeper leagues should even stay in bidding near $10 since you're unlikely to see a loss and could wind up with significant future profits.
While trading Matt Guerrier for Marte looked mildly questionable back in April as Pittburgh looked likely to waive Marte, I saw nothing wrong in securing the services of one of the more promising young relievers in the game. Marte rewarded the Sox with an unexpectedly fantastic season as he even wind up as a co-closer for an extended stretch. Even though he maintained roughly the same command he displayed a year ago for the Pirates, he also increased his G-F from .71 to 1.27 and received better defensive support. Now Marte loses roughly half his value with Billy Koch installed as the undisputed closer, but since he absolutely dominates lefties and saw significant success against right-handers, Marte should remain one of the more valuable middle relievers in the league. He's a good buy anywhere under $5, and he shouldn't hurt you up to around $7 or $8.
Hawkins' rebound from one of the worst pitchers in baseball to one of the top 20 relievers in the game ranks as one of the more amazing comebacks of 2002. However he'd hinted at this potential both in 1996 while starting at AAA Salt Lake and in 2000 when he first started closing. The only truly shocking part of this performance is that he posted an abhorrent 36:39 K:BB in 2001, so we have no idea if he can maintain his level of effectiveness. He looks more likely to echo his second-half numbers of a 3.33 ERA on a 19:7 K:BB in 27 IP with 25 H and 1 HR over a full season, which would roughly leave his 2002 value roughly halved.
Osuna earned the closer-of-the-future label a half decade ago yet never even exceeded a half dozen saves until 2002. While he compiled decent stats last season, I also don't see any indicators of future greatness as a 3.7 BB/9 and a .89 G-F limit the upside suggested by an 8.8 K/9. He also won't see many save opportunities now that he's joined the Yankees, so bidding more than a couple bucks on Osuna seems unwise as I don't expect him to even approach double-digit value this year.
I actually expected Romero to follow fellow lefty relievers like Ted Lilly, Damian Moss, and Casey Fossum into the rotation, but Minnesota's willingness to embrace a left-handed closer and lack of high-upside right-handed relievers keeps Romero's future anchored in the bullpen. While Romero slipped from a 48:17 K:BB in 48 IP in the first half to a 28:19 K:BB in 33 IP after the break, I believe most of his control problems were due to fatigue. Hopefully he grew accustomed to pitching in several dozen games rather than starting about thirty and will maintain his skills in 2003, since even though he'll likely regress in some areas, his skills could notably slip and he'd still earn several bucks of value. Romero also looks like the logical candidate to close for the Twins in 2004 with Guardado likely leaving in free agency, making Romero a solid buy anywhere below the upper single digits and a decent selection in keeper leagues even around $10.
Click
here to read the previous article.
Please e-mail your comments to
tim@rotohelp.com. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rotohelp |
||||||||||||
All content ©2001-18
Rotohelp, Inc.
All rights reserved. PO Box 72054 Roselle, IL 60172. Please send your comments, suggestions, and complaints to: admin@rotohelp.com. |
||||||||||||